of the then very popular show host Hans-Joachim Kulenkampff, or "coolie" said in the course of aging once, he would in time leave of the stage because it's not even notice when one mentally be declining. And he did not want to just drive so far until one or the other well-meaning friend or colleague a friendly hug him and tell him: "You pen what I tell you now is only meant well ...."
Günter Grass could this time a meaningful exits have missed. At least he stands up for an SPD, which stands for horrendous social cutbacks, both for exorbitant tax breaks to the super rich, too rigid for dismantling the rule of law remains. Only in the last joint Federal Government with the Union, the SPD was decided to adopt the so-called security laws with, including Internet blocking law and deployment of the Bundeswehr in the interior, and the Afghanistan war have SPD and the Greens started.
precisely this praise Olaf Scholz, who is shown to the servants of big business, see Others:
http://alles-schallundrauch.blogspot.com/2010/06/ scholz-to-have-it-was-in-bilderberg.html
already is a piece that Günter Grass has been approved to be taken seriously as a political critic. But his knowledge of history must be understood in light of his age and his own claim alleged only as childish and naive error analysis.
He says among other things:
"Too few have the time when the Nazis were great, defended the Weimar Republic and so democracy was a victim of totalitarianism, as soon as she was born. .
Source: http://www.hannes-swoboda.at/?p=4157
He actually proves that he has absolutely no idea has, since the Weimar Republic had failed not for nothing that the people, and had nothing to do with democracy in the strict sense: the ruling parties were constable of big business and disregarded the interests of the common people completely (what this reminds me only?). Especially these shortcomings of the Weimar Republic were the ones both the Communists and the Nazis, the people driven into the arms. The Weimar Republic was not worth preserving, it was no surprise that for their preservation nobody really strongly made: Big business sat on Hitler, the people to Hitler or the communists, because the two least one promise: Get rid of Weimar!
That the Günter Grass such things are not known, proves that he is as a political adviser can not take seriously that he does not stand for wisdom and understanding of history, but for superficial view.
The same, he proves also in terms of its expressed opinion, we must fight against the assimilation of the Sinti and Roma. That is, he maintains a parallel society in one country would be useful, although it can not absolutely deny that the same companies for the purpose of unity of a people stand in the way and historically and also in the present always lead to ugly conflicts and led.
this Grass can not at all (more?) Seriously, and so is his advice to evaluate, to select the SPD.
Günter Grass would do well to take inspiration from the above-quoted insight of Hans-Joachim Kulenkampff, and that Olaf Scholz such "electoral assistance" still likes to carry in stock, speaks only as a complement to it.
Greetings
Dipl.-Kfm. Winfried Sobottka, UNITED ANARCHIST and order of?
TOP IMPORTANT:
http://belljangler.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/dem-wahren-satanismus-auf-der-spur-karen-haltaufderheide-doris-kipsiekerannika-joeres-die-grunen-wetter-die-grunen-berlin the-green-hamburg-the-green-koblenz-renate-kunast-the-left-witten /
0 comments:
Post a Comment